Ask the Expert

The Italian American Veterans Museum is proud to post a monthly memorabilia blog written by our curator, Steve Corbo. A military historian with more than 50 years of research under his belt, he has written articles on the subject and serves as the military consultant for Fra Noi, the Chicago-area Italian-American magazine. Submit your questions to, including a high-resolution photo of the memorabilia if one is available.

Check out these flyboys with a nose for art!

The practice is as old as aviation itself: the personalization of aircraft by painting a name or unique design on an aircraft’s fuselage. Since these depictions often appeared on the front of the aircraft, they became known as “nose art,” and to a certain extent, the practice continues to this day.

The origin seems to center around WW l. America’s top ace, Medal of Honor recipient Eddie Rickenbacker, flew into battle with the 94th Aero Squadron’s famed “Hat in The Ring” painted on the side of his SPAD XIII biplane.

Count Francesco Baracca, Italy’s top ace during WW I, had a black horse, bucking up on its hind legs, painted on his plane. Automaker Enzo Ferrari adopted that image as the symbol of his company, which today is recognized around the world.

Between the wars, the practice carried over into civilian aviation. Most notably, when Charles Lindbergh became the first person to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean, he did so in a plane with “Spirit of St. Louis” painted on its nose.

However, it was during the Second World War that this practice took off. Painting everything from your best girl’s name to popular cartoon characters to risqué depictions of fantasy females became the norm rather than the exception. So much so that certain commands censored the nose art it would allow on their aircraft.

Often, highly skilled artists created flying works of art utilizing the aircraft’s skin as their canvas. There was heated competition between pilots to have the best and most unique nose art. Artists who could create these masterpieces became highly sought after and valued. Many planes received a great deal of publicity and became icons with America’s wartime public. As a morale booster for the crews who flew the planes into combat and for the folks at home who followed their progress, nose art became de rigueur with most aviation units on both sides of the lines.

While the practice reached its zenith during WW ll, it witnessed a resurgence during the Korean War. During the Viet Nam War, many a helicopter was adorned with nose art. A favorite was Charles M. Schulz’s cartoon character Snoopy, complete with goggles and aviator’s scarf, as he piloted his doghouse into the skies. While generally unauthorized today, occasionally nose art can still be seen on military aircraft.

— Steve Corbo

When Air Force pilots were “crushing it”

With some 15 million Americans in service during WW II, wearing a military uniform became the fashion plate for an entire generation. It seemed you needed a scorecard to tell them apart. In addition to each service having their own distinctive uniform, there were subsets of uniforms, depending on the job, climate, or occasion in which the uniform was being worn. General George Patton even designed a uniform for his tankers, which featured gold buttons and a gold tanker’s helmet. It was rejected by the War Department.

Often necessity led to a modification or in some cases an entirely new design. A perfect example was the development of camouflage uniforms mirroring the jungle environment of the South Pacific. There was one modification to a piece of uniform headgear, born out of necessity and made by the troops themselves, that has become the iconic symbol of the Army Air Force Combat Pilot. It became known as the “50 Mission Crush” or simply “The Crusher.”

Bomber pilots often wore their officer service caps in the cockpits of their planes. These caps had a stiff leather visor and a wire stiffener that ran around the crown of the hat to maintain its round, military appearance. This made it difficult to wear radio headphones over the service cap. In the interest of practicality and comfort, pilots began removing the stiffeners, thereby making it easier to wear the hat with radio headphones. It also gave the hat a “crushed” appearance. The more missions one flew, the more crushed it became, leading it to become the badge of an experienced, combat pilot. In the inset photo actor Jimmy Stewart, a real combat pilot in WW II, is wearing a “Crusher” while being decorated by an officer wearing the traditional rigid-crowned hat.

While not adopted by the other services and initially frowned upon by the Army Air Force, it proved an immensely popular look with Army Air Force pilots and non-pilots alike. True “Crushers” were even made and privately purchased. They were not fitted with the wire stiffener and had a completely flexible visor.  The hat could then be folded and put in one’s back pocket when not being worn. Technology in the form of planes flying at higher altitudes and the development of fire-retardant materials put an end to “The Crusher.”  Today, it remains the quintessential symbol of the WW II Army Air Force combat pilot.

— Steve Corbo

Ancient weapon, modern war

The Vietnam War saw the advent of some of the 20th Century’s most deadly and sophisticated weapons. These included the latest Soviet surface-to-air missiles that protected North Vietnamese cities and the USS Long Beach (CGN 9), the world’s first nuclear powered guided missile cruiser, which the U.S. Navy deployed in the Tonkin Gulf.

For all its modern technology, the Vietnam War also employed weapons of the most ancient and simple design. These included everything from punji sticks, which were nothing more than sharpened pieces of bamboo, smeared with feces to induce infection, to the renowned Montagnard Crossbow.

The Montagnards (the name is derived from French for people of the mountains) were various groups of indigenous people who inhabited the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Fiercely independent, they lived outside the mainstream of Vietnamese culture and society, and many practiced Catholicism taught to them by French Missionaries. This put them at odds with the Communist North Vietnamese and their Viet Cong allies, and made them a natural ally and asset to U.S. forces. They were heavily recruited and welcomed with open arms by the U.S. military and performed invaluable services, especially alongside U.S. Special Forces teams. As U.S. Soldiers trained and became familiar with the Montagnards, they became familiar with their crossbow.

Totally out of place in a world of M1 carbines, M16s and AK-47s, the crossbow is believed to date back more than a thousand years. Yet in the hands of a skilled marksman, it remains a surprisingly effective weapon.

An outstanding weapon for hunting small game, its light weight and virtually silent operation made it ideal for a quiet kill. Easy to use and easier to repair, it could be very lethal, especially with its arrows dipped in poison. Under the right conditions, and with a need for covert operation, it could also be lethal when used against a human target.

These crossbows became synonymous with the Montagnards and were often sought out by GIs as souvenirs to bring back to the States, especially by those who served with the Montagnards.

The Montagnard crossbow pictured above was brought back from Vietnam by U.S. Army Veteran Joe Fornelli, and now hangs on display at the Italian American Veterans Museum.

— Steve Corbo

Japanese blades of glory

During the Second World War, the most popular of all war souvenirs in the islands of the Pacific and occupied Japan was the “Samurai” sword.

Deeply imbedded in the psyche of the Japanese, the sword took on almost a sacred role. It was identified with the legendary Samurai warrior code of bushido. Not only did it hold a place of reverence in the ceremony and regalia of the Japanese imperial forces, but it was also designed to serve as an effective combat weapon.

By contrast, the U.S. military phased out the sword as a combat weapon around the time of the First World War, using it thereafter only for ceremonial purposes. This made the “Samurai” sword even more exotic and desirable to U.S. forces who encountered them in combat.

Many of these swords were family heirlooms, literally hundreds of years old and handed down from generation to generation. They were of superb quality, handmade from the finest materials, tempered and honed to a razor-sharp edge. Considered works of art, they were often “signed” by the master swordsmith who crafted the piece, many of whom became widely known and enjoyed a measure of celebrity due to the quality of their work. Not only functioning as a symbol of command, they were carried into and often used in battle by Japanese officers and senior enlisted men alike.

As the Japanese military expanded in the 1920s and 1930s, the demand for swords exceeded the supply and government arsenals stepped in to fill the void. Machine made and often of inferior quality, these mass-produced blades were issued to officers and NCOs to meet the increasing demand. One version, the Type 95 for use by non-commissioned officers, was even serial numbered.

Not considered a true “Samurai” sword and not as valuable as the older, handmade models, these were none-the-less eagerly sought by American servicemen, and counted among the thousands of swords brought back to the United States as souvenirs after World War II.

Pictured above is a long line of Japanese officers waiting to surrender their swords at the end of the war. Immediately below is an older blade signed by a master swordsmith. Below that is a mass-produced piece from the modern era, complete with leather combat cover to protect the “saya” or scabbard. All images are courtesy of Wikipedia. A Type 95 sword is part of the blades exhibit at the Italian American Veterans Museum.

— Steve Corbo


Worn with pride: A brief history of military patches

The Italian American Veterans Museum and Library has one of the most extensive patch collections on display in the Chicago area. Frequently, I’m asked by visitors, “My father has this patch on his Army uniform. What does it mean?”

While other branches of the U.S. military use patches to establish esprit de corps and identify different units, ships and organizations, it is the Army that has truly incorporated them into their heraldry and as an integral part of their uniform.

The use of patches to identify units can be traced back to the Civil War, but their use didn’t become official and fully authorized until World War I. By the Second World War, the practice was firmly incorporated into the U.S. military.

Interestingly, shortly after WW II, on September 24, 1947, the Marine Corps did away with patches on their uniforms as a means of division/unit identification. This decision was made to foster the spirit that the Marines are “a unified body organized to fight as a whole, and individual shoulder patches representing one type of service did not reflect the spirit of the Corps.” The practice remains in force today, while the Army has taken the exact opposite approach.

The Army has authorized patches to identify corps, armies, divisions and even brigades, with unofficial patches being worn by smaller units, particularly those overseas and serving in combat zones. The production and use of these unauthorized patches reached their height during the Vietnam War, during which local tailors would make up patches of any design for any group for very little money. These “in country” patches are unique in their design, and since they were made in limited numbers, have become very collectable. So much so that an entire industry, principally in Asia, has grown up around reproducing these patches to meet the demand.

Army uniforms are often encountered with organization patches on the upper shoulders of both sleeves. The patch on the left sleeve indicates the organization the soldier is currently serving with, while the patch on the right sleeve indicates the organization the soldier served with in combat.

Above and below are examples of some of the patches on display at the Italian American Veterans Museum and Library. If you have a patch you wish us to identify, contact us at

— Steve Corbo



Coins have iconic place in military and beyond

In recent years, one of the most popular military collectibles has been the “challenge coin.” Generally the size of a silver dollar, it comes in a variety of shapes and sizes, with each coin being unique and specific to an individual unit or organization.

Challenge coins are usually presented by a military unit’s commander as a show of appreciation for a job well done. They are also presented for special events such as completion of training, deployment overseas or an individual act of excellence, noteworthy enough to merit recognition. These serve to enhance morale, develop unit cohesion, and give the recipient a sense of belonging. Traditionally the presenter will conceal the coin in their right hand and pass it to the recipient in a handshake.

It is hard to pinpoint exactly when the first challenge coin appeared. For centuries, coins have been used to acknowledge the actions of soldiers and as a means of identifying membership in a group or organization. However, it was in the post-Vietnam War era that the challenge coin gained widespread popularity within all branches of the U.S. military.

Today, just about every unit has their own challenge coin. The practice proved so popular it now extends far beyond the military. Most law enforcement agencies and fire departments as well as many other organizations have created challenge coins for their members.

Perhaps the challenge coin gets its name from the traditional obligation that if you receive one you must always have it in your possession. If challenged by another member of your unit, it must be presented upon demand. This challenge will often take place in a drinking establishment and if you are unable to produce your coin, you buy a round of drinks for all members of your unit who are present. If you do present the coin, then the person who issued you the challenge buys the drinks!

Firmly established as a tradition within the U.S. military, its widespread use and endless variations make the challenge coin a natural among military and civilian collections.

Celebrating a game-changing rifle

General George Patton called it, “The greatest battle implement ever devised.” Recalling his Army basic training at the end of World War II, my father, Steve A. Corbo, said, “It weighed 9-1/2 pounds the first mile and 109-1/2 pounds every mile after that.” Both were referring to the .30 caliber M1 Garand, the standard battle rifle of the United States from World War II through the late 1950s.

Designed by John Garand and adopted by the U.S. military in the late 1930s, it was truly revolutionary. The first standard-issue semi-automatic rifle to be used by any nation’s military forces, it was loaded via an eight-round clip. Once loaded, it would fire eight shots as fast as the trigger could be pulled. After the final shot, the empty clip would automatically eject and the weapon could immediately be reloaded.

By comparison, the M1903 Springfield rifle, which was replaced by the M1, required the operator to manually pull back the bolt, load a five-round stripper clip, push the bolt forward to chamber a round, fire the weapon, manually pull the bolt back to eject the empty shell, and again push the bolt forward to chamber another round. In the hands of a trained soldier, this would result in a rate of fire of 20 to 30 rounds per minute.

The M1 rifle increased that rate of fire to 40 to 50 rounds per minute. This gave U.S. soldiers a tremendous advantage against German, Japanese, and Italian soldiers, who were still widely using bolt action rifles similar to the M1903.

A well-made and robust weapon, the M1 was simple to use and field strip for maintenance. It functioned extremely well in combat under all kinds of adverse conditions, from the tropics of the South Pacific to the freezing cold of Korea.

As warfare evolved, the need arose for a rifle that could deliver both semi- and fully-automatic fire along with increased round capacity. Enter the M14, which replaced the M1 in 1958, although many still remained in the arsenals of Reserve and National Guard components long after 1958. When the Illinois National Guard hit the streets of Chicago during the civil disturbances of 1968, they were armed with the M1. With bayonet affixed, even unloaded, the M1 proved very effective at crowd control.

More people served in the U.S. military during World War II than any other period in our history. In 1945 alone, more than 12 million Americans were serving with several million more serving during the Korean War. To some extent, almost every one of them had a familiarity with the M1 rifle. More than 60 years after being phased out of active duty, this durable combat weapon still holds a place of honor and distinction.

The M1 Garand pictured here belonged to Marine Sergeant John Berley, a Purple Heart recipient who served under the legendary Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller at the “Frozen Chosin” reservoir in November and December 1950 during the Korean War. The bayonet is the standard M1 issue, which has been modified by chrome plating and a special grip for use by ceremonial and drill teams only.

The following is a link to a 2016 video of the United States Marine Corps silent drill platoon sunset parade. You’ll note the Marines are using World War II vintage .30 caliber M1 Garand rifles with bayonet affixed. This venerable weapon is still seeing service today!

To view the video, click here.

The evolution of a bayonet

When the United States entered World War II, most of its military was still equipped with the WW I era, bolt-action M-1903 Springfield rifle, accompanied by the M-1905 bayonet. Military doctrine of the First World War dictated “over the top” charges by mass infantry formations, closing with the enemy and engaging in close-quarter hand-to-hand combat. The bayonet designed for use with the M-1903 rifle reflected that doctrine. The rifle was just under 45 inches in length while the bayonet measured another 20 inches. Even unloaded, this presented a formidable weapon for use in close quarters combat. That bayonet is pictured at the bottom of the accompanying photo.

In the late 1930s, the U.S. adopted the .30 caliber, semi-automatic M1 Garand as the standard service rifle. One of the requirements was that the bayonet used on the M-1903 rifle must also fit the new Garand. As the M-1903 rifle was phased out and gradually replaced by the Garand, the M-1905 bayonet was still being issued. However, the nature of warfare had changed dramatically since its inception. The mass infantry assaults from the trenches of 1917 were a thing of the past. The military had mechanized, the horse cavalry was gone and more than ever before, the U.S. soldier found himself in a variety of vehicles. The 20-inch bayonet of WW I was awkward and difficult to wear in vehicles. It was impracticable and of little use for anything other than its intended purpose. Complaints began to come in from the troops.

The military responded in 1943, adopting a shorter bayonet measuring 14 inches in total length. But with WW II raging and material shortages everywhere, the U.S. could not afford to scrap some 2 million M-1905 bayonets in service. Instead, these blades were cut down to the 14-inch length, reconditioned with a parkerized finish and plastic grips and re-issued.

As the war dragged on, millions of men were inducted into the military and millions of Garand rifles were produced, thereby exhausting the remaining supply of M-1905 bayonets. U.S. armories pivoted on a dime, producing the M-1 bayonet specifically designed for the Garand to meet 1943 specifications.

It is identical to the reworked M-1905 version in size and finish, but a key difference allows you to tell them apart. The “blood groove” — that slight indention that runs along the flat side of the blade — stops about two inches before the tip in the current version, as it also does on the original M-1905. While on the reworked M-1905 version, the blood groove runs all the way through the shortened blade.

Can you tell which of our three blades is the retrofitted M-1905 version and which is the M-1 version designed for the Garand?

— Steve Corbo

Drawing a bead on a vintage enemy rifle

Visitors to the Italian American Veterans Museum often comment on the rifle we feature in our Souvenirs of War exhibit. It’s a weapon brought back from World War II by U.S. Army Pfc. John Filetti and graciously donated to our museum. This vintage firearm is a Japanese Type 38 rifle in caliber 6.5 mm. These were adopted by the Japanese army in 1905, during the 38th year of the reign of Emperor Meiji, hence the 38 designation.

A finely crafted and well-finished weapon, the Type 38 was extremely accurate and simple to use. Some 3.5 million were produced at four separate arsenals in Japan, the majority of them prior to 1932. Its major drawback was its underpowered 6.5 mm cartridge. Despite this shortcoming, it was used up to the end of World War II.

The rifle was replaced in 1932 by the Type 99. Employing the same basic design, but with several enhancements, the Type 99 used a more powerful 7.7 mm cartridge, which proved brutally effective against American forces during the island-hopping battles of the South Pacific.

Japanese military weapons were considered the personal property of the emperor. As such, his personal insignia, the imperial chrysanthemum, was stamped into the top of the receiver on each rifle. Under the terms of surrender, the Japanese had to give up their rifles but were allowed to keep their emperor. To not dishonor him, the Japanese completely or partially ground off the chrysanthemums before turning over their guns.

Rifles that were captured on the battlefield retained their imperial symbols. The example we have on display in our museum has its chrysanthemum fully intact.

— Steve Corbo

WW II’s version of emails from the front

One of the most important events in military life is mail from home! This is never more crucial than in time of war, with troops serving overseas and in harm’s way. The effect mail has on morale can often be the difference between success and failure. With millions of US troops overseas during WW ll, delivery of the mail was a top priority. This created a logistical dilemma. Mail had to compete with priority shipments of food, munitions, fuel, medical supplies and other material necessary to wage war. Enter the iconic V Mail!

The troops overseas and their families and friends on the home front used pre-printed, standardized forms to write letters. These folded into their own envelope and once mailed, the letters were routed to a central station. Photos of the letters were taken and placed on microfiche. The original letters were then destroyed. Rather than transporting thousands of letters to the war zone, they simply transported rolls of microfiche! When the microfiche reached its destination, it was again routed to a central station where the film was developed, printed in a version smaller than the original V Mail form, and delivered to the addressee. To put it in perspective, the weight of 150,000 single-page letters was reduced from 2,575 pounds to 45 pounds, thereby freeing up essential space needed to transport the materials of war.

In addition, the V Mail forms helped facilitate censorship, thereby enhancing security. During the Second World War, mail sent back to the US from overseas was rigorously censored. Officers, shouldering the responsibility of command, were entrusted to self-censor. But all mail coming from enlisted men was censored before leaving the sender’s unit. An additional hurdle was faced by soldiers who were foreign born, or the children of foreign-born parents. It was often easier for them to write to their families in their native language, but to no avail. If a soldier wrote to their parents in Italian and no officer was available who could read it, these letters were simply destroyed. If the soldier was lucky, they were told “Write in English or don’t write at all.”

— Steve Corbo

Why does that helmet look so familiar?

After using the same helmet through three major wars and for more than 40 years, the U.S. Armed Forces made a radical switch in the early ’80s. That’s when they introduced the Personal Armor System for Ground Troops, or PASGT helmet. Molded from a more shrapnel-resistant Kevlar, as opposed to steel, the new combat headgear offered additional protection by covering the ears and more closely hugging the head. But why did it look so familiar?

That’s because its design mimics the iconic helmet used by Germany during the two world wars. One of the most popular souvenirs brought from Europe by GIs serving there during and after WW II, the “Stahlhelm” had a unique shape that instantly identified it as being issued by the German military. Millions of them were available, so obtaining one was no problem. They were small enough to easily fit into a duffle bag and be carried home, or in a box to be mailed home from APOs (Army Post Offices) throughout the European Theatre of Operations.

Although German combat helmets retained the same basic design, there seemed an endless variety, making them a collector’s delight. There were variances in color, three different patterns (M35, M40, and M42) and each branch of the military, along with paramilitary organizations that had their own distinct markings. There were also camouflage varieties and a highly sought-after helmet designed for use by airborne troops.

Adopted by the German military in 1916, the design proved so superior that the U.S. Military adopted it when they redesigned the helmet they had been using since 1941. It first saw action with U.S. forces in the invasion of Grenada in late 1983 and was widely used by U.S. forces during the Gulf War in 1990-1991.

Pictured below is German WW II M 40 helmet, identifiable by its rolled edge and stamped air vent. The German national eagle is in gold, revealing the helmet as being issued by the navy. Pictured above is the U.S.-issued PASGT helmet. This model has a camouflage cover designed for use in the deserts of Kuwait and Iraq. The cover can be changed to match the terrain. Due to its remarkable similarity to its German predecessor, it was nicknamed the “Fritz Helmet.”

— Steve Corbo

For a German news clip showing factory workers turning Nazi helmets into colanders after the war, click here.


Targeting an iconic sidearm

Perhaps the most recognizable and iconic pistol of all time is the Pistole Parabellum, or German P 08, commonly referred to as the Luger. Originally developed by Austrian gun designer George Luger in 1898, it was adopted by the German Military in 1908, hence the nomenclature “P” for Pistole and “08” for the year.

A true testimony to German engineering, the Luger was as well-built a weapon as was ever mass produced for military service. Immediately recognizable due to its unique toggle design, the Luger’s balance, semiautomatic functionality, eight- round magazine capacity and association with the German military proved immensely popular, and it became one of the most sought-after “war souvenirs” in two world wars.

Most, but not all, were manufactured in Germany by DWM (Deutsche Waffen und Munitionsfabriken) and Mauser. While most had a standard barrel length of 4 inches, there were also 6-inch (Naval) and 8-inch (Artillery) versions. Most were 9 MM in caliber, but others were in .30 caliber.

Having attracted worldwide attention, the Luger even attracted the interest of the U.S. military. Before settling on the Colt 1911 .45 pistol as the standard U.S. military sidearm, the U.S. Army ordered several Lugers for the purposes of testing and evaluation. Prior to WW l, there was even a model known as the “American Eagle,” designed for sale in the U.S. market.

Used extensively by the German military in WW I, it was also produced for various foreign governments. This resulted in a multitude of variations, as well as an assortment of accessories, including a detachable shoulder stock and a “snail drum magazine” which could increase round capacity from the standard 8 to 32. Production continued between the wars and commercial models were widely sold on the civilian market. The many variations made it a collector’s dream, and to this day, the Luger remains one of the most sought-after and collectible pistols.

As Germany geared up for the Second World War, the demand for sidearms skyrocketed and so did production of the Luger. Due to buyouts and name changes, after World War l, production was taken over primarily by Mauser. In an attempt to hide the actual number of weapons being produced and who was producing them, and to circumvent the terms of the Treaty of Versailles (which limited the size of the German military and military arms production), Germany used a system of letter and numeric codes rather than having the name of the manufacturer appear on the pistol. This also served as a security measure once the war started. If a shipment of newly manufactured Lugers was captured, enemy intelligence would not be able to determine when and where they had been made. Therefore, they would not be able to seek out and destroy the facility producing the pistols.

Beginning in the 1930s, Mauser began using code “S/42” and later switched to “BYF,” although the Mauser “banner” still appeared on commercial pieces and pieces destined for use by Germany’s police agencies.

As the Second World War dragged on, the Luger fell victim to its own lofty production standards. The Luger was made from top quality materials, comprised of individually machined parts, serial numbered and matching to each individual piece. In short, production was expensive, extremely labor intensive and far too time consuming.

After 1942, production at the Mauser and other arms factories switched over to the Walther designed P 38. A semiautomatic pistol in 9MM, it had fewer moving parts and was easier, cheaper and less time consuming to manufacture. It soon replaced the Luger as Germany’s standard 9MM sidearm.

The Luger pictured here was brought back from WWII, as a souvenir, by U.S. Army T/5 John Maoloni, who served with a recon unit in Africa and Europe. We are honored to have this highly desirable pistol donated to our museum and on permanent display.

This is a typical Mauser military-issue piece as indicated by the letter code “BYF.” It was manufactured in 1942, near the end of the WWII production run. It is 100 percent matching numbered and carries Waffenamt military acceptance proof marks. It retains its dark lustrous bluing, beautifully checkered wood grips and high-quality finish. This is a firearm work of art that has stood the test of time.

— Steve Corbo

For more about John’s military services, click here.


Long forgotten souvenirs of war

Military service seems to create a penchant for collecting wartime souvenirs. When conventional armies fought each other, there was an ample supply of enemy equipment and memorabilia to bring back from the battlefront. But the Vietnam War played out differently. The United States didn’t face a highly standardized and universally equipped enemy. The availability of “war trophies,” or “battlefield pickups,” just wasn’t there.

To meet the demand, an entire cottage industry developed around making souvenirs for the GIs. Among the most popular were “Tour Jackets.” They were cheap and easy for the locals to make and they could be personalized to one’s unit, location, and dates of service. They were immensely popular to mail home or bring back as gifts.

However, as the war dragged on and became less and less popular, so did Vietnamese Tour Jackets. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, they became especially unpopular back in the United States, where wearing them often attracted unwanted attention. They faded from consciousness, often winding up in the backs of closets or simply thrown out. Included are examples from my personal collection that transport us back to a different place and time.

The jacket in the upper left belonged to a member of the 173rd Airborne Brigade who served in-country from 1966 to 1967. The inscription, “When I die I’ll go to heaven because I’ve spent my time in hell,” says it all. The jacket in the upper left was created for a soldier who served during the same timeframe at the U.S. air base and military installation at Bien Hoa.

By the time the inset jacket was created, during a 1969-1970 tour of duty, support for the war was eroding in America, hence the inscription, “The willing fighting the unjust for the ungrateful.” The jacket is made from a U.S. government-issue poncho liner no doubt pilfered for the purposes. This jacket is unique for the First Cav and First Aviation Brigade patches hand-sewn by a Vietnamese seamstress, who also made due note of An Khe and Pleiku, two major U.S. bases where each unit was based.

The Combat Infantryman Badge (above) and the Expert Infantryman Badge

Badges of skill and courage

My Uncle Carl Maffia was born on New Year’s Eve 1926 in Chicago. A graduate of Crane Tech High School, he entered the Army in March 1945. As an 18-year-old draftee, he was destined for the infantry, to be used in the final drive to defeat Germany and Japan. Before heading overseas, Maffia joined the ranks of a small group of elite Soldiers qualified to receive the newly created Expert Infantryman Badge.

Carl Maffia

The badge was created in 1943 to recognize those who mastered the skills of infantry warfare. It also served as special recognition of the hardships and high casualty rate endured by the infantry. In 1944, the first class of 100 Noncommissioned Officers underwent intensive testing, facing physical and mental challenges, to determine who would receive the Army’s first Expert Infantryman Badges. Of those 100, only 10 completed the course!

With a washout rate of 90 percent, it was one of the toughest courses in the Army. As the war continued, the Expert Infantryman Badge was overshadowed by the Combat Infantryman Badge. Also created in 1943, it was awarded only to infantrymen engaged in combat against an armed enemy. Often it was awarded en masse to entire units regardless of one’s individual skill level. For those entitled to both badges, the Combat Infantryman Badge takes precedence because it is for combat action as opposed to training excellence. The two are never worn together. Both badges are so coveted, they are worn above all other decorations, medals and badges on the Army uniform.

Maffia was sent to Germany rather than the Pacific. By the time he arrived, the war in Europe was over. He became part of the Army of Occupation until his discharge in November 1946. To this day, professional soldiers in the United States Army Infantry strive to earn the Expert Infantryman Badge. It confirms commitment to their craft, mastering the unique challenges faced by the infantry and is often essential for promotion to a higher rank and position of responsibility.


Venditti earned rare honor decades after D-Day

Louis Venditti’s combat exploits began on June 6, 1944, when he parachuted into France with the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division in the pre-dawn hours of D-Day. By war’s end, he had a chest full of medals, including four Battle Stars for his participation in four major European campaigns, and two Invasion Arrowheads on his European Theatre of Operations ribbon. He also had two stars on his paratrooper wings for combat jumps on D-Day and in Operation Market Garden.

In addition, he received the Bronze Star Medal, Purple Heart for wounds received in combat on October 06, 1944, Good Conduct Medal, American Campaign Medal, World War II Victory Medal, Presidential Unit Citation, Combat Infantryman Badge and Pathfinder Badge. He was also entitled to wear the Order of the Orange Lanyard from the Netherlands for the liberation of Holland, and the Belgian Fourragere for the defense of Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge.

But his most unique and rare decoration was presented 65 years later at a special ceremony in Paris, France. Venditti was one of 38 American World War II Veterans awarded the National Order of the Legion of Honor by the French Government for participation in the D-Day Invasion to free France from Nazi occupation. Considered the highest honor in France, the medal was presented on June 05, 2009. Among the dignitaries in attendance were French President Nicolas Sarkozy and U.S. President Barack Obama. We are honored to have Louis Venditti’s French Legion of Honor in our collection, with plans to place it on display in 2021.

For a full accounting of Louis’ military exploits, click here.



A tale of bravery, told through memorabilia

Louis Venditti served with the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the legendary 101st Airborne Division. He was one of the “Band of Brothers” made famous by the Stephen Ambrose book and the HBO miniseries. When he returned home from WW ll, he did so in an Army uniform with a unique set of patches and badges not commonly seen.

In the pre-dawn hours of June 6, 1944, Venditti parachuted into Normandy, France, as part of the first wave of allied troops in the massive D-Day Invasion. A recipient of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action, he participated in some of the fiercest combat faced by U.S. troops in Europe. In addition to D-Day, he participated In Operation Market Garden for the liberation of the Netherlands and the Battle of the Bulge.

At the Battle of the Bulge, in the town of Bastogne, Belgium, the 101st was surrounded by overwhelming German forces. The Germans sent the paratroopers an ultimatum: Surrender or face certain death. The 101st Commander, Brigadier General Tony McAuliffe, replied with one of the best one-word answers in the annals of military history. McAuliffe simply replied “Nuts.” The 101st never did surrender and fought their way into Germany, ending the war at Berchtesgaden, the site of Hitler’s home.

The items pictured above are actually from Venditti’s uniform. Heading clockwise from the upper left, first and foremost is the “Screaming Eagle” patch of the 101st Airborne Division, worn on Venditti’s left sleeve. Originally established in 1918 as the 101st Division, the “Airborne” tab was picked up when they were designated as one of the two original U.S. Airborne divisions, formed by the U.S. Army in August 1942.

Taking aim at a pivotal pistol

A captured enemy pistol was one of the most popular souvenirs brought back by GIs serving overseas during WW ll. They were readily available, of no practical use to the U.S. government and easy to carry. The U.S. military permitted GIs to bring back these coveted war trophies by the thousands. The pistol pictured above was brought home by World War II veteran Louis Venditti.

Louis was a member of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division. They were the “Band of Brothers” made famous by the 1992 Stephen Ambrose book and the 2001 HBO miniseries. We’ll share more of Louis’ wartime memorabilia and history in future postings. For now, let’s focus on the pistol, which has a unique role in the annals of modern warfare.

Sorting out Silver and Bronze Stars

Question: What’s the difference between a Silver Star and a Bronze Star?

Answer: Our museum celebrates several Silver and Bronze Star recipients, including Army Sgt. James Orlando “Lon” Fornelli during World War II (right) and Army Pfc. John Puccini during the Korean War (left). Both medals are awarded for actions in connection with combat, but it’s a matter of proximity and degree.

Army ribbons spotlight military service at a glance

Question: My father was in the Army during World War II and had these on his uniform. What do they mean?

Answer: Those are “ribbon bars” and they serve as a colorful shorthand resume of the wearer’s military career. The ribbons pictured were custom-made in the post-WW II era and sewn on your father’s uniform, unlike the standard “pin back” version issued by the military. Each of the bars is divided into three sections, and each section represents a medal earned during your father’s time in the service.

If you haven’t already done so,
please join our email list.